The brat green, decoded
Every tint and shade of #8ACE00, the exact hex values, and a live contrast checker so you know whether your text survives on it. All math, computed in your browser.
Colour lab
click any swatch to copy its hex
Why this specific green
The colour that launched a thousand covers is #8ACE00
On this page the number is the product. Click the big swatch to copy the hex, take the tints and shades row-by-row, and check any text/background pairing you intend to ship. The rows above are simple mixes: tints step towards white, shades step towards black, nine steps each, computed in your browser. They exist because a real layout needs neighbours, not one heroic colour: The number most people get wrong: white text on brat green is effectively unreadable — the contrast is about 1.9:1 against a 4.5:1 minimum. Black text on it clears AAA at roughly 10.3:1. The checker above computes this live for any pair, and the preset chips show the pairings that actually work. The checker uses the same maths the web standard defines: each channel is converted to a linear value, combined into relative luminance with fixed weights (red 21.26%, green 71.52%, blue 7.22%), and the lighter value divided by the darker with a 0.05 offset. The thresholds shown — 4.5:1 for body text, 3:1 for large text and UI, 7:1 for the strictest tier — come from the W3C contrast minimum. Nothing here is a rough estimate; if the badge says pass, the maths is the standard’s. A text graphic rarely needs more than three values from these rows, and knowing which three is most of the job. The reliable recipe: take the base as the single loud element, take a mid shade as the canvas behind it if you need depth, and take white or black for the words — decided by the checker, not by taste. What breaks layouts is the reverse habit: three loud accents competing on one canvas, which is how a strong colour starts looking cheap. For UI work the same rule holds with one addition: the 3:1 tier applies to meaningful graphics, so buttons and icons built from the tints need their own contrast check against whatever sits behind them, not just against the base green. It is the hex the community converged on and the one this site’s tools assume. Nobody official published a brand spec, which is why the tints row exists — real designs need the family, not a single value. Screens manage colour differently, and PNG exports carry no profile enforcement here. The hex is the source of truth; judge colour on the device your audience uses. Any two. Both inputs accept arbitrary colours, so you can test a client palette against the same thresholds. No. The mixing, luminance and contrast calculations all run in your browser; nothing is sent anywhere. Body text needs the 4.5:1 pass. Large headings and UI marks can live with 3:1. If a pairing fails both, it fails, whatever the aesthetic says.Tints and shades, and when each earns its place
Range
Use it for
Steps 1–3 (lightest tints)
Card fills and chips on dark layouts, where the full acid value would vibrate
Steps 4–6
Secondary accents — borders, dividers, hover states
Step 7–8 shades
Quiet backgrounds behind white text in the same family
The base #8ACE00
One loud element per canvas. No more.
How the contrast numbers are produced
Pairings that survive review
Using the family in a real layout
FAQ
Is #8ACE00 the official colour?
Why do my exported images look slightly different?
Can I check any two colours or only these?
Does the tool upload my colours?
Which badge should I care about?
Every tool on this page runs inside your browser. Nothing you type is sent to a server, stored in an account, or logged — there is no upload step in the code. See the privacy policy for the one analytics service used and what it does not collect.